Game Boy logo, console and packaging
Contributed by Antonia Taylor on May 26th, 2024. Artwork published in
April 1989
.
Topics▼ |
Formats▼ |
Typefaces▼ |
8 Comments on “Game Boy logo, console and packaging”
The “Handy Game Machine” text appears to be set in either Gona (Shaken) or one of its popular digitizations, New Rodin (Fontworks) and Shin Go (Morisawa).
Thank you, Almahbuby! I have added Gona.
I’d be willing to bet that it’s New Rodin – Nintendo has a pretty extensive history with Fontworks.
I’ve asked Akira Yoshino of TypeCache. Assuming the box in question is from 1989, he argues it’s not New Rodin. Akira writes:
In addition, Akira kindly provided more info and pointers about Gona (or Go-na). I have updated the typeface page, including design credits and links to a more detailed history by Ryogetsu Katsurai* and a recording of Ryota Doi’s talk about Go-na (1975) and another groundbreaking typeface also designed by Yukihiro Nakamura, the rounded sans serif Na-ru (1973), held at ATypI 2019 Tokyo.
*) According to Katsurai, Rodin is from 1990, and New Rodin from 2002.
Just a minor addition, of which I’m sure you’re aware. I think all the Nintendo products are using Limited rather than Corporate. You can tell from the A and B, or even the E, which is which. More extensive comparison here. It’s rather strange that these various small changes were made. Are they the result of buying into the “change 10 percent” myth? A lot of the competing type vendors actually ended up supplying Limited rather than true Corporate. There may even be more typeset in Limited during the phototype era than its original.
Thanks for the addition and the convincing visualization, Patrick! Looks like the same applies to the other Nintendo uses, as well as to the ColecoVision, no? Would you argue in favor of giving Limited a separate typeface page? I’m wary that we won’t always have text that includes the tell-tale glyphs. But I can be convinced (as long as you promise to help with determining the ID).
Thank you so much for the help everyone!
Florian, I think it’s okay to keep them all grouped under Corporate. It’s not that big a deal as the differences are minor. Corporate appears to be the source from which Limited sprang. Earliest Limited listing I’ve seen is by Quad Typographers in 1974, which might be when it first appeared after Corporate. I don’t know enough about whether Roc Mitchell maybe also licensed Corporate under the Limited name or other aliases to type vendors after Alphabet Innovations. Or whether he also made these small revisions at a later date. I’ve seen some 1980s listings for Corporate that are actually showing the Limited glyphset. And a Monsen catalog from 1979 also lists the very similar New Idea with the E from Corporate, which one assumes makes it a more direct alias/copy of it. Same catalog also lists Corporate and Corporate Image, yet the latter appears to have the E from Limited. So, it would appear that Monsen copied Limited and called it Corporate, yet also copied Corporate and called it New Idea. It’s all very muddled. But AI’s Corporate is still the earliest listing. Unless that fact changes, I think it is fair for Corporate to be the “in use” name under which all its other aliases fall. I merely point out the distinction for the Nintendo use as it is the most famous.