An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

Space City News, vol. 1, no. 1 (Jun 5 1969)

Contributed by thankyoucokieroberts on Feb 18th, 2024. Artwork published in
June 1969
.

4 Comments on “Space City News, vol. 1, no. 1 (Jun 5 1969)”

  1. Thank you for this contribution!

    Like similar underground publications from this period, the production of Space City News combines a range of typographic techniques, including various typewriters, hand lettering, dry transfer type, possibly phototypesetting, and more.

    Annlie was a Letraset original issued in 1966. The jumpy lines in Berthold-Grotesk suggests that they were composed with rubdown type, too. Chartpak showed such an adaptation as Simplex Bold (Simplex was Olive’s name for Berthold-Grotesk) in a 1965 catalog.

    I’ve added a couple of IDs in addition to those you already found. I didn’t look deeper into the typewritten text – if anyone has any insights into those, let us know.

    Same goes for the bold condensed sans that appears in a number of headlines, but is eluding me. It’s not Railroad Gothic, see e.g. the S and also the fact that there’s a lowercase. I meant to say Filmotype Ginger, but it appears to be a tad bolder and wider, and also not a perfect match in all details. Filmotype Gem is too bold and wide and doesn’t have a lowercase. Here are some assorted samples.

  2. The 1950s-era bold condensed gothics appear to be all the same Lettering Inc. face, 220·8, which had upper and lower cases available as of 1951. In later specimens, the “S” with the nearly horizontal spine seems to have been substituted for the version with a more 45° diagonal. From the earlier specimen, it seems that the diagonal spine was already in use for the oblique forms. It is possible that those alternates were available from day one, but they also could have been added later as tastes changed over the decades.

    from 1951 specimen “Lettering Inc. Presents Eighty-Eight New Lettering Styles” [Newberry Library]
    The 1951 specimen of 220·8 feels like a very close match.

    from “The Lettering Inc Index of Basic Styles” circa late 1960s
    Later specimen of X220·8 with alternate “S”.

  3. These Lettering Inc workhorse gothics would later form the basis for the Directors Gothic series of revivals.

  4. That’s outstanding! Thanks for the missing ID and also for the specimen scans, Josh, very helpful.

    I had a hunch that the Lettering Inc. library will provide answers for several of the mid-20th century font ID riddles from the United States. I also figured that some of the Filmotype designs were partly based or inspired by it – the shown 20·8 and Fargo is one such case – and there probably are some crosslinks to the early PLINC catalog to be found as well.

    Unfortunately, Lettering Inc. (along with early Headliners) is a blank spot on my map, due to a lack of access to specimens. All the more I’m grateful for these glimpses into their catalog.

    I’ve assigned Directors Gothic to this Use and updated our typeface page for it, with more info and a link to these specimens. As you point out in your other comment, Summerour’s “digital revivals are not 100% loyal to the hand-drawn source material”. I still think its best to have a single page for the digital and analog versions. I understand that “Directors Gothic” is not a name used in the 20th-century materials, is it?

    Among the 90 styles of the digital family, Directors Gothic 210 Ultra probably comes closest to the snippets shown above. (The current Font Bros Collection page lists only 88 styles, omitting 210 Ultra in upright and oblique, of all things.) This heaviest weight of the narrowest width is narrower (but the 220 is already way too wide) and also has a lower x-height. The font has several alternates, including for the S you mention. The sample below features the alternate forms for K and t. There’s no g with vertically cut loop.

    Resetting using the digital Directors Gothic 210 Ultra with some of its alternates

Post a comment