An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

Volksbühne Berlin season magazine 2013/2014

Contributed by Florian Hardwig on Oct 4th, 2013. Artwork published in .

7 Comments on “Volksbühne Berlin season magazine 2013/2014”

  1. It’s a shame that such an interesting typographic proposal shows this enormous flaws…

  2. Where can I purchase this magazine? I’ve looked online but to no avail…

  3. Visitors of the Volksbühne can pick up a free copy at the theater. I don’t know whether the spielzeitheft can be ordered. You could try and ask.

  4. Jerónimo, as I had hinted at above, I can’t say for sure whether these really are accidental ‘flaws’. Maybe the rules were broken very consciously, as part of a strategy. To upset not only those who would like keep 1930s blackletter locked away in the ‘poison cabinet’ of typography, but also sticklers for detail like us? After all, the Volksbühne is not exactly a haven of convention. Maybe it’s a moot point to argue about traditional typesetting rules in the identity of a theater that stages a play where the entire text consists of ‘Murmel’ (mumble) …
  5. Mhm… Yes, you’re right. Let’s give them the benefit of doubt.

  6. Adriano says:
    Oct 15th, 2014 7:44 pm

    The flaws are intentional. The letters are drawn by Mr Neumann, Jr.

  7. No it’s not like the-rapist, it is much worse. Therapist is not a compound word, it comes from Greek θεραπεία (healing) with the Latin suffix -ist, hyphenation the-rapist is not morphologically incorrect, it is just misleading. Volkſbühne is morphologically incorrect since the (missing) is a morpheme (the grammatical morpheme of the genitive case), <ſ> is not a morpheme. Linguistically the former is an unhappy accident, the latter an error.

Post a comment