An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

MassArt Art Museum identity

Contributed by Ciarán  on Oct 9th, 2019. Artwork published in .

2 Comments on “MassArt Art Museum identity”

  1. Museum Sans look similar to Filmotype Zingo

  2. It’s not entirely different, but I wouldn’t call it similar. What you’re observing is called “translational contrast”: the thick and thin parts are distributed around a diagonal axis (it’s nicely visible in the letter o), as if written with a broad-nib pen held at an angle. If you want to learn more about this topic, I recommend Gerrit Noordzij’s The Stroke.

    While this aspect is indeed common between Museum Sans and Zingo (and many other typefaces), it’s also where the similarities end.

    Zingo is flowing, with quick strokes and “upticks” at the baseline, suggesting an informal hand. Museum Sans, in contrast, is drawn very accurately, almost in a constructional way. It’s more akin to designs that evolved from Rudolf Koch’s school, like Stahl and Lydian – but with a contemporary twist, and with the contrast amount taken to an extreme.

    Another aspect is proportions: According to its designer, Museum Sans “channels proportions from inscriptional lettering”. This shows in the wide forms for letters like O and the W with crossed diagonals, contrasted with narrow ones for S. Zingo is quite different in this regard: it’s overall condensed, and its caps don’t follow classical proportions.

Post a comment