An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

Ned Kelly (1970) movie posters

Contributed by Matthijs Sluiter on Feb 21st, 2019. Artwork published in .
Ned Kelly (1970) movie posters 1
Source: www.imdb.com License: All Rights Reserved.

Two posters and an advertisement for a 1970 movie about Australian bushranger Ned Kelly.

The film production faced setback after setback: there were protests against the film location and against Mick Jagger as lead actor; Jagger broke up with his girlfriend and co-star Marianne Faithful, who subsequently took an overdose and had to be replaced; Jagger was accidentally hit by a gunshot, there was fire, illness, and more misfortune. Nonetheless, the movie was finished and released – and not received well:

As the ill-fated titular hero, Mick Jagger, the rock singer, with a beard that makes him appear more Amish than Australian, is, sadly, simply a dour renegade who rarely becomes the “wild colonial boy” of the legend. Only a few members of the large supporting cast, notably Clarissa Kaye, as his mother; Janne Wolmsley, as his girl, and Martyn Sanderson, as a villainous Irish constable, are momentarily meaningful. “Such is life, Mick Jagger flatly states before being hanged, an observation that can’t quite be applied to “Ned Kelly.” — A. H. Weiler, The New York Times

The movie poster typography uses a set of fonts with roots in wood (poster) type. Coincidentally or not, it looks like the unknown designer picked the same typeface combination for the big type as used for the album cover for Bob Dylan’s 1964 album The Times They Are A-changin': “Mick Jagger” is set with tight-not-touching Gothic (Nesbitt), with diagonally cut terminals. The blocky type with its nearly-touching slabs used for the movie title is probably Antique. The smaller text is set in Clarendon.

An alternate poster shows the same typography and the same split screen / split personality image concept but this time it is executed as an illustration, with some extra guns and death.
License: All Rights Reserved.

An alternate poster shows the same typography and the same split screen / split personality image concept but this time it is executed as an illustration, with some extra guns and death.

Advertisement with the same lettering used for “Mick Jagger” and a better view of the rare sight that is Jagger with a beard; movie title set in Volta Bold, credits and blurb set in Univers.
Source: flavorwire.com License: All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement with the same lettering used for “Mick Jagger” and a better view of the rare sight that is Jagger with a beard; movie title set in Volta Bold, credits and blurb set in Univers.

Typefaces

  • Gothic (Nesbitt)
  • Antique (Wells)
  • Clarendon
  • Volta
  • Univers (Selectric)

Formats

Topics

Designers/Agencies

Artwork location

1 Comment on “Ned Kelly (1970) movie posters”

  1. Note the weird proportions of Univers in the last image. This is the version made for the IBM Selectric Composer which we have already encountered in the Kleding maken post. IBM’s engineers had come up with a system of nine units for all letter widths, which proved to be a challenge for Adrian Frutiger when he was asked to adapt his Univers to this coarse system:

    […] the biggest problem was that each letter of the alphabet was given a fixed unit, no matter which typeface was used. They had used Times as the basis, and texts that were typed using a classic typeface didn’t look like they were done on a typewriter – they printed well. With Egyptienne and grotesque typefaces, i.e. with all other styles, however, there was a problem. Let’s take the s for instance: in Times it’s relatively narrow, but in a grotesque like Univers it’s wide. And that’s exactly where it started to get difficult. The Univers s should have had five instead of the allocated four units. The g is too narrow as well. The classic g has a narrow form but the grotesque g has a wide one, just like a d or q. The crippled g is a typical characteristic of the Composer-Univers. But it was worse with the F and T. You can clearly see the big gaps.

    From Heidrun Osterer, Philipp Stamm (ed.): Adrian Frutiger – Typefaces. The Complete Works. 2014.

    And what about the bold for “BUT” – was it made by double-stroking?

Post a comment