An independent archive of typography.
Topics
Formats
Typefaces

Utopias and Magnificent Obsessions — Eventi Letterari 2013

Contributed by A M on Sep 15th, 2015. Artwork published in
circa March 2013
.

5 Comments on “Utopias and Magnificent Obsessions — Eventi Letterari 2013”

  1. Jacques Le Bailly says:
    Sep 15th, 2015 9:10 am

    The typeface was awarded a Red Dot Design Award in 2013…

    Note to oneself: Surprises and disappointment come in many unexpected ways…

  2. Impossible geometry has certainly become a trend in recent years! I suppose the Red Dot jury wasn’t aware of your Macula, released the previous year. BTW, Utopia also happens to have a lot in common with Zelek (1970s) and Escheresk (2009).

  3. Jacques Le Bailly says:
    Sep 15th, 2015 8:14 pm

    I am well aware of the trend and predecessors in this particular style. Please let them continue showing us some awesome and creative solutions and designs !

    To me, the surprise was that an institute like the Red Dot award committee wasn’t up-to-date with their knowledge. Nothing more, nothing less.

  4. My studio mate Frank (2F) drew a related impossible alphabet based on isometric projection for his own use in 2012, initially named Maurits and currently known as Twist. Not every instance of similarity is a case of imitation, some things are simply in the air. When I showed him Macula, Frank expressed his admiration for this inventive and professional design — but concluded that his version works better for his purposes.

    I agree with Jacques that a jury that decides on typeface design awards should have a thorough overview over the scene. This reminds me of Bombere and Vexier — the two related designs were both among the winners of a competition held by Letraset in 1973. More award trivia? François Robert’s Chicago was awarded in a Mecanorma competition and released in 1969. A few years later, he successfully submitted the pretty similar Astra to competitor Letraset.

  5. Jacques Le Bailly says:
    Sep 16th, 2015 2:01 pm

    Not every instance of similarity is a case of imitation, some things are simply in the air.

    I couldn’t agree more.

Post a comment